Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What is Shannon Wiley looking forward to at this year's Asembia Specialty Pharmacy Summit? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Attorney Spotlight: Juhi Patel

February 10, 2016

Juhi Patel1. Tell us about your practice.

My practice involves all aspects of soft IP law, from trademark and copyright prosecution to monitoring, enforcement and defense of intellectual property rights. I handle much of the monitoring work for our clients' trademarks, including domain name monitoring, and an interesting development in that area is the creation of new gTLDs (such as .bank and .attorney) and the problems this poses for businesses that want to protect their brands, domain names, trademarks and other intellectual property from abuse by third-parties.

2. Why did you choose to pursue a career in the legal field?

I wanted to become a civil rights lawyer because I always loved history—I was a history major in college—and was inspired by the ability of lawyers to incite massive social changes. When I finally arrived at law school, I quickly learned that I hated constitutional law. Thankfully, Shelley Thomas convinced me to take a class on copyright law with her and I came to the realization that I really enjoyed IP law.

3. How did your previous experience at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) prepare you for your role as an attorney within a law firm?

I worked as a trademark examining attorney at the USPTO for three years. During that time, I really learned the fundamentals of trademark law, the trademark prosecution process and how the USPTO and its examining attorneys think. I examined several thousand applications for all varieties of marks, goods, services and industries; I do not believe that kind of hands-on experience can be gained in such a short period of time anywhere else. The exposure to so many applications has made me a better attorney for our clients because there are very few situations in the trademark prosecution process which I have not seen before.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.