Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did a clerkship with Judge Merritt change the way Chris Climo approaches the practice of law? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Eli Richardson Quoted in Law360 Article on Senator Menendez's Attempt to Dismiss Corruption Charges

Media Mentions

September 17, 2015

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Eli Richardson provided comment for an article outlining the attempt by U.S. Senator Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and alleged co-conspirator Dr. Salomon Melgen to have the court dismiss 15 of the 22 corruption counts that were handed down against the pair earlier this year. In April 2015, Menendez and Salomon were indicted by a federal grand jury in New Jersey on corruption charges related to Menendez's relationship with Melgen; the indictment alleges that the Senator used his office to further the business interests of the doctor and accepted bribes in return for favors.

The September article in Law360 focuses in part on wire-fraud counts in the indictment that allege an unusual form of interstate wires – or, more precisely in this case, "signals and sounds" – transmitted in furtherance of the defendant's alleged scheme to defraud. Specifically, the prosecutors allege in two counts that the interstate "signals and signs" – an essential element of the offense of wire fraud – consisted of communications that took place between the pilot of Melgen's private jet and the air traffic controller on the ground while Menendez was a passenger on Melgen's jet. As Eli points out for the article, "'[c]ourts typically construe this notion [of interstate communications in furtherance of a scheme to defraud] very broadly, but this could be a rare case in which the government stretched the concept too far. The court may sympathize with the notion that the scheme to defraud is absolutely not furthered or carried out in any way by unspecified signals to an air traffic controller from a plane that happens to be carrying alleged beneficiaries of the scheme to defraud'"

The full story, "Menendez Faces Tough Sell In Bid To Cut Corruption Charges," was published by Law360 on September 16, 2015 and is available online.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.