Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

Terry Clark Quoted on Federal Circuit Infringement Decision by Law360

Media Mentions

August 14, 2015

Bass, Berry & Sims Intellectual Property Litigation Chair Terry Clark was quoted in an article about the Federal Circuit's August 13 en banc decision to restore a $45.5 million jury verdict in Akamai v. Limelight.

Terry told the publication that "in upholding infringement in this case, the Federal Circuit looked at objective circumstances, such as the standard contract executed by Limelight customers, the company's distribution of materials, as well as its installation guidelines, rather than looking at evidence of intent or whether there were substantial noninfringing uses."

"On the defense side, the court has made it more difficult to draw the line between evidence we would be asserting in defense of direct infringement as opposed to indirect infringement," he said. "It's unclear what would be the best defense." The complete article, "Limelight Case Widens Scope of Direct Infringement," is available to subscribers here.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.