Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did a clerkship with Judge Merritt change the way Chris Climo approaches the practice of law? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Download the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017, authored by Bass, Berry & Sims

The Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review 2017 details all healthcare-related False Claims Act settlements from last year, organized by particular sectors of the healthcare industry. In addition to reviewing all healthcare fraud-related settlements, the Review includes updates on enforcement-related litigation involving the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute, and looks at the continued implications from the government's focus on enforcement efforts involving individual actors in connection with civil and criminal healthcare fraud investigations.

Click here to download the Review.

Tony McFarland and Jay Knight Comment on Cybersecurity Risk Disclosures

Media Mentions

June 9, 2015

Bass, Berry & Sims attorneys Anthony (Tony) McFarland and Jay Knight lent their insights to an article in The Wall Street Journal on cybersecurity risk disclosures. As outlined in the article, while the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has previously issued guidance on cybersecurity risk disclosure, many companies are uncertain on how to proceed when there is a question of what should be included on their 10-K statement. For example, what are the benefits of fuller disclosure and will disclosing more help the business if investigated for a data breach? Tony, chairman of the firm's Technology Committee, noted that companies should be prepared to make fuller disclosures, even on matters that are not necessarily mandated by state breach notification laws. "The SEC is becoming of the opinion that it is better to make disclosures if a company has had a number of incidents, even if they are not individually material, and even if that's not the perspective the company or its counsel would bring to the table in responding to a specific incident."

Jay, head of the firm's Capital Markets Subgroup and former SEC counsel, said that companies that have been subject to breaches are providing guidance for other companies, and that "best practices" for disclosure are based on industry. Tony added that this is a dynamic and fluid area, saying "This is an area where continual monitoring and diligence and being up to date is important, so you can make sure your own disclosures are accurate, up to date and within the range of other companies' disclosures in your industry."

The full article, "The Morning Risk Report: Cybersecurity Disclosures Are Risky Business," was published by The Wall Street Journal's "Morning Risk Report" on June 8, 2015 and is available online.

Content from The Wall Street Journal article was cited in the article, "SEC Suggests, But Doesn't Require, Full Disclosure of All Cybersecurity Risks," that was published by CFO.com on June 9, 2015.  


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.