Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How does Jordana Nelson's prior experience as a general counsel inform her work with firm clients? Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

The M&A Advisor Winner 2017The M&A Advisor announced the winners of the 16th Annual M&A Advisor Awards on Monday, November 13 at the 2017 M&A Advisor Awards. Bass, Berry & Sims was named a winner in the two categories related to the following deals:

M&A Deal of the Year (from $1B-$5B) – Acquisition of CLARCOR Inc. by Parker Hannifin Corporation

Corporate/Strategic Deal of the Year (over $1B) – Acquisition of BNC Bancorp by Pinnacle Financial Partners

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Tony McFarland and Jay Knight Comment on Cybersecurity Risk Disclosures

Media Mentions

June 9, 2015

Bass, Berry & Sims attorneys Anthony (Tony) McFarland and Jay Knight lent their insights to an article in The Wall Street Journal on cybersecurity risk disclosures. As outlined in the article, while the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has previously issued guidance on cybersecurity risk disclosure, many companies are uncertain on how to proceed when there is a question of what should be included on their 10-K statement. For example, what are the benefits of fuller disclosure and will disclosing more help the business if investigated for a data breach? Tony, chairman of the firm's Technology Committee, noted that companies should be prepared to make fuller disclosures, even on matters that are not necessarily mandated by state breach notification laws. "The SEC is becoming of the opinion that it is better to make disclosures if a company has had a number of incidents, even if they are not individually material, and even if that's not the perspective the company or its counsel would bring to the table in responding to a specific incident."

Jay, head of the firm's Capital Markets Subgroup and former SEC counsel, said that companies that have been subject to breaches are providing guidance for other companies, and that "best practices" for disclosure are based on industry. Tony added that this is a dynamic and fluid area, saying "This is an area where continual monitoring and diligence and being up to date is important, so you can make sure your own disclosures are accurate, up to date and within the range of other companies' disclosures in your industry."

The full article, "The Morning Risk Report: Cybersecurity Disclosures Are Risky Business," was published by The Wall Street Journal's "Morning Risk Report" on June 8, 2015 and is available online.

Content from The Wall Street Journal article was cited in the article, "SEC Suggests, But Doesn't Require, Full Disclosure of All Cybersecurity Risks," that was published by CFO.com on June 9, 2015.  


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.