Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did Sylvia Yi's previous work at the Department of Homeland Security prepare her for working with government contractors at Bass, Berry & Sims? Find out more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

FCPA: 2016 Year in Review & 2017 Enforcement Predictions

A review of trends and developments in FCPA as well as a look ahead into what to expect for 2017. This report aims at providing corporate leaders and companies with the knowledge they need to comply with the FCPA and avoid litigation in 2017.

Read now

Attorney Spotlight: Dustin Carlton

January 12, 2015

Dustin CarltonTell us about your practice.

I advise employers on various labor and employment matters. I draft, review, and/or update company policies, employment agreements, or other contracts to ensure compliance with laws governing workplace safety, union activity, equal employment opportunity, family and medical leave, disabilities, and layoffs. I regularly publish articles providing employers with guidance on emerging issues. And I represent employers in employment-related disputes, including claims of discrimination, wrongful discharge, wage and hour violations, and FMLA violations.

Why did you choose to pursue a career in the legal field?

My story is a bit unusual and marked by what I will call "serendipity." I never intended to pursue law. After undergrad, I worked for a short stint as a licensed financial planner. I loved counseling clients, but I knew I wanted to continue my education. I thought initially that I would attend business school for an M.B.A. I always considered myself a businessperson first anyway. I love math and constantly analyze numbers. However, I missed the testing deadline and did not want to pay additional fees to take the GMAT, so I looked into the LSAT. The LSAT was cheaper (thinking in terms of numbers again!), and I could still get an M.B.A. through a joint degree, which I thought might be better anyway. Well, needless to say, the rest is history. I took the LSAT, applied to Wake Forest, and matriculated there shortly thereafter. After my first semester, I realized that a J.D. was enough for me. The law degree enabled me to continue my passion advising and counseling clients in ways that I had never imagined. Life is funny like that sometimes.

How did your experience clerking for a federal judge prepare you for practicing law?

Clerking for a federal judge was one of the best decisions of my life. I was fortunate to work for a judge who was interested in making me a better lawyer. He took the time to teach me the "nuts and bolts" of the court system so that I would not only have knowledge but understanding. He taught me about trial strategy. He taught me how to distinguish the essential from the non-essential. And most importantly, he crafted and refined my legal writing. These are all skills that I rely on today.

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.