Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How does Jessie Zeigler anticipate the intersection of privacy and smart technology will impact the future of litigation? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

Primary Care Providers Win Challenge of CMS Interpretation of Enhanced Payment Law

With the help and support of the Tennessee Medical Association, 21 Tennessee physicians of underserved communities joined together and retained Bass, Berry & Sims to file suit against the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to stop improper collection efforts. Our team, led by David King, was successful in halting efforts to recoup TennCare payments that were used legitimately to expand services in communities that needed them. Read more

Tennessee Medical Association & Bass, Berry & Sims

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Healthcare Private Equity Compliance Checklist

The complex and ever-changing healthcare regulatory and enforcement environment, including increased focus on the role of private equity firms in their portfolio companies, make compliance a top priority for private equity firms investing in healthcare companies. The best way to limit your exposure as a private equity firm is to avoid a compliance misstep in the first place. Additionally, an effective and robust compliance program for your portfolio healthcare company makes it much more attractive to potential buyers and helps you avoid an unexpected and costly investigation or valuation hit down the road. Download the Healthcare Private Equity Compliance Checklist to assess whether your portfolio company's compliance program is up-to-date.

Click here to download the checklist.

Sixth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Fraud Class Action Suit Against Morgan Keegan & Co.

September 12, 2011

Significant Win for Memphis Broker-Dealer Provides Decisive Guidance on the Preclusive Reach of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act

Memphis, Tenn., (September 12, 2011) - On September 8, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of Morgan Keegan & Co., a Memphis, Tennessee-based financial services firm, upholding the dismissal of a class action fraud suit brought by a group of mutual fund investors, who claimed their investments lost value in the wake of the 2007 financial crisis.

In a decision that will have a wide-reaching impact on federal/state jurisdictional issues in securities litigation generally and the mutual fund industry in particular, the appellate court agreed that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standard Act of 1998 (SLUSA) barred all state law claims asserted by the investors. "The Sixth Circuit's opinion will make it much more difficult for plaintiffs hoping to avoid federal jurisdiction in class actions alleging securities fraud," said Matthew M. Curley, a member at Bass, Berry & Sims who represented Morgan Keegan in this matter.

The Sixth Circuit upheld the 2009 decision by Judge Samuel H. Mays of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, which dismissed with prejudice all claims in the case, including the investors' claims for fraud, negligence and breach of contract.

The plaintiffs argued that SLUSA did not apply based on an exception in the statute called the "Delaware carve-out." The Sixth Circuit disagreed, holding that the exception could not save the plaintiffs’ claims from dismissal. Not until this case has any district court or appellate court considered whether claims asserted on behalf of holders of mutual funds fit within the Delaware carve-out exception to SLUSA.

"We are certainly pleased with the Sixth Circuit's opinion affirming the dismissal of this action with prejudice," said Bass, Berry & Sims' Curley. "It provides important guidance on the broad scope of SLUSA's preclusive reach and how narrowly its Delaware carve-out should be interpreted."

The appellate court also rejected the plaintiffs' argument that nine of their 13 claims in the suit were not precluded by SLUSA because they were not pleaded as fraud claims. Again, the Sixth Circuit disagreed, finding that "[b]ecause all of plaintiffs' claims include allegations of fraud, SLUSA damns each one."

The appeal is styled Atkinson v. Morgan Asset Management Inc., No. 09-6265, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Morgan Keegan & Co. was represented by Matthew M. Curley of Bass Berry & Sims PLC. Regions Bank was represented by David Bruce Tulchin of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and PricewaterhouseCoopers was represented by Timothy A. Duffy of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. The plaintiffs were represented by Vernon Jay Vander Weide of Head Seifert & Vander Weide PA and Jerome A. Broadhurst of Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, PLC.

About Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
With more than 200 attorneys representing numerous publicly traded companies and Fortune 500 businesses, Bass, Berry & Sims PLC has been involved in some of the largest and most significant litigation matters and business transactions in the country. For more information, visit www.bassberry.com.


Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.