Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How did Brianna Powell's work as a law clerk prepare her for practicing law? Read more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

In June 2017, Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ: PNFP) closed a $1.9 billion merger with BNC Bancorp (NASDAQ: BNCN) pursuant to which BNC merged with and into Pinnacle. With the completion of the transaction, Pinnacle becomes a Top 50 U.S. Bank. The merger will create a four state footprint concentrated in 12 of the largest urban markets in the Southeast. 

Bass, Berry & Sims has served Pinnacle as primary corporate and securities counsel for more than 15 years and served as counsel on the transaction. Our attorneys were involved in all aspects related to the agreement, including tax, employee benefits and litigation. 

Read more details about the transaction here.

Pinnacle Financial Partners logo

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Successful Defense for SDVO Small Business

Client Type: Private Company

The Government Contracts team successfully defended a service-disabled, veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) in a size appeal filed at the SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). BES Design/Build, a VA certified SDVOSB, was the successful awardee of a contract issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs to upgrade fire sprinkler systems at the VA Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee. A disappointed bidder protested the award, arguing that BES was not a small business under the $14 million size standard for the procurement at issue.

In its protest, the disappointed bidder argued that BES was affiliated with several other companies, and the combined revenue of all BES affiliates exceeded the procurement's $14 million size standard. The protester alleged that BES shared common management with another company by virtue of a mentor-protégé agreement, and with additional companies owned by BES's minority member. In response, BES presented evidence to the SBA showing that the majority owner of BES was a service-disabled veteran in complete control of the company. Further, BES certified that its majority owner did not have any management authority in any of the alleged affiliates.

The SBA area office determined that because no other individual or company could control BES, and BES did not have control over any other company, there was no affiliation to be found. Thus, the SBA determined that BES was a small business and denied the protest. Unsatisfied, the disappointed bidder filed an appeal with OHA challenging the SBA size determination. In its appeal, the disappointed bidder made additional allegations of affiliation not raised in the original protest. 

We argued against the inclusion of the new allegations, on the basis that protesters are not permitted to introduce new grounds of protest in an appeal. In addition, we argued that even if the new affiliation allegations were properly raised, the evidence clearly showed that BES was not affiliated with any of the companies alleged as affiliates by the protester. OHA agreed, and denied the appeal. As a result, BES maintained its SDVOSB status and the VA was able to move forward with the award to BES.

You Also May Be Interested In:

Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.