Close X
Attorney Spotlight

What colorful method does Claire Miley use to keep up with the latest healthcare regulations as they relate to proposed transactions? Find out more>

Search

Close X

Experience

Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

On December 1, 2016, Parker Hannifin Corporation and CLARCOR Inc. announced that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement under which Parker will acquire CLARCOR for approximately $4.3 billion in cash, including the assumption of net debt. The transaction has been unanimously approved by the board of directors of each company. Upon closing of the transaction, expected to be completed by or during the first quarter of Parker’s fiscal year 2018, CLARCOR will be combined with Parker’s Filtration Group to form a leading and diverse global filtration business. Bass, Berry & Sims has served CLARCOR as primary corporate and securities counsel for 10 years and served as lead counsel on this transaction. Read more here.

CLARCOR
Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Securities Law Exchange BlogSecurities Law Exchange blog offers insight on the latest legal and regulatory developments affecting publicly traded companies. It focuses on a wide variety of topics including regulation and reporting updates, public company advisory topics, IPO readiness and exchange updates including IPO announcements, M&A trends and deal news.

Read More >

Successful Defense for SDVO Small Business

Client Type: Private Company

The Government Contracts team successfully defended a service-disabled, veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) in a size appeal filed at the SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). BES Design/Build, a VA certified SDVOSB, was the successful awardee of a contract issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs to upgrade fire sprinkler systems at the VA Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee. A disappointed bidder protested the award, arguing that BES was not a small business under the $14 million size standard for the procurement at issue.

In its protest, the disappointed bidder argued that BES was affiliated with several other companies, and the combined revenue of all BES affiliates exceeded the procurement's $14 million size standard. The protester alleged that BES shared common management with another company by virtue of a mentor-protégé agreement, and with additional companies owned by BES's minority member. In response, BES presented evidence to the SBA showing that the majority owner of BES was a service-disabled veteran in complete control of the company. Further, BES certified that its majority owner did not have any management authority in any of the alleged affiliates.

The SBA area office determined that because no other individual or company could control BES, and BES did not have control over any other company, there was no affiliation to be found. Thus, the SBA determined that BES was a small business and denied the protest. Unsatisfied, the disappointed bidder filed an appeal with OHA challenging the SBA size determination. In its appeal, the disappointed bidder made additional allegations of affiliation not raised in the original protest. 

We argued against the inclusion of the new allegations, on the basis that protesters are not permitted to introduce new grounds of protest in an appeal. In addition, we argued that even if the new affiliation allegations were properly raised, the evidence clearly showed that BES was not affiliated with any of the companies alleged as affiliates by the protester. OHA agreed, and denied the appeal. As a result, BES maintained its SDVOSB status and the VA was able to move forward with the award to BES.

You Also May Be Interested In:

Related Professionals

Related Services

Notice

Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.