Close X
Attorney Spotlight

How does Jordana Nelson's prior experience as a general counsel inform her work with firm clients? Read more>


Close X


Search our Experience

Experience Spotlight

The M&A Advisor Winner 2017The M&A Advisor announced the winners of the 16th Annual M&A Advisor Awards on Monday, November 13 at the 2017 M&A Advisor Awards. Bass, Berry & Sims was named a winner in the two categories related to the following deals:

M&A Deal of the Year (from $1B-$5B) – Acquisition of CLARCOR Inc. by Parker Hannifin Corporation

Corporate/Strategic Deal of the Year (over $1B) – Acquisition of BNC Bancorp by Pinnacle Financial Partners

Close X

Thought Leadership

Enter your search terms in the relevant box(es) below to search for specific Thought Leadership.
To see a recent listing of Thought Leadership, click the blue Search button below.

Thought Leadership Spotlight

Regulation A+

It seems that lately there has been a noticeable uptick in Regulation A+ activity, including several recent Reg A+ securities offerings where the stock now successfully trades on national exchanges. In light of this activity, we have published a set of FAQs about Regulation A+ securities offerings to help companies better understand this "mini-IPO" offering process, as well as pros and cons compared to a traditional underwritten IPO.

Read now

Bass, Berry & Sims Defends Award in GAO Bid Protest of $143 Million Task Order

Client Type: Private Company

The Bass, Berry & Sims government contracts team successfully defended an award to CWU, Inc. of a $143 million task order by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) for linguist support services. The task order was issued under the Defense Language Interpretation and Translation Enterprise (DLITE) contract, which is a five-year, $9.7 billion Multi-Award Task Order Contract that provides interpretation and translation services DOD-wide at a variety of security levels.

The cost-plus-fixed-fee task order, which has a one-year base period and two one-year options, is for linguist, interpretation and translation support services to intelligence operations in order to meet ongoing mission requirements for the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), European Command (EUCOM) and African Command (AFRICOM). The Army first selected CWU for award in November 2014. SIG, the incumbent contractor, protested that award and the agency took corrective action in December 2014. INSCOM affirmed its original award decision in March 2015 and SIG again protested. 

In its second GAO protest, SIG argued that the Army's evaluation of proposals was unreasonable and resulted in a flawed selection decision. Specifically, the protester alleged flaws in the Army's evaluation of the offerors' proposals in the technical, past performance and cost factors. The genesis of most of the protester's arguments was the fact that it was the incumbent contractor, and thus the protester argued its incumbency should have merited higher evaluation scores. For example, the protester argued that as the incumbent contractor it should have been rated superior with respect to transition risk because, SIG argued, it was the only offeror that that could offer a "no-risk" transition. Likewise, the protester argued that the Army failed to recognize the differences in the offerors past performance, specifically referencing its incumbent contract. The GAO found the record did not support SIG's arguments, but rather supported the Army's evaluation of SIG's proposal given that the protester had difficulty in filling linguist positions under the incumbent contract and had been issued a letter of concern relating to the number of candidates submitted for government consideration. 

After multiple rounds of briefing, the GAO denied each protest ground, finding reasonable the Army's determination that CWU offered a superior solution for the required linguist and translation services.

You Also May Be Interested In:

Related Professionals

Related Services


Visiting, or interacting with, this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Although we are always interested in hearing from visitors to our website, we cannot accept representation on a new matter from either existing clients or new clients until we know that we do not have a conflict of interest that would prevent us from doing so. Therefore, please do not send us any information about any new matter that may involve a potential legal representation until we have confirmed that a conflict of interest does not exist and we have expressly agreed in writing to the representation. Until there is such an agreement, we will not be deemed to have given you any advice, any information you send may not be deemed privileged and confidential, and we may be able to represent adverse parties.